SLVI vs VXUS
NEOS Silver High Income ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, SLVI or VXUS?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SLVI led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLVI | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.78% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $8M | $163.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 2.38% |
| Holdings | 1 | 9,293 |
| YTD Return | -17.74% | +8.76%Best |
| 1Y Return | -17.74% | +13.05%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +17.91% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +7.89% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -67.2% | -39.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 15.8 years | $1,855,726Best | $19,835 |
| Fund Family | NEOS | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 6, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 15.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 5, 2011 to Nov 13, 2026 (15.8 years).
SLVI vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SLVI vs VXUS Performance
NEOS Silver High Income ETF (SLVI) is an ETF from NEOS and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLVI returned -17.74% while VXUS returned +13.05%. Year to date, SLVI is down 17.74% versus a gain of 8.76% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -67.2% for SLVI and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLVI charges 0.78% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $78 vs $5 annually, a gap of $73 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLVI currently yields 1.28% against 2.38% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in SLVI and 8,462 in VXUS, totalling 18.2% and 89.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in SLVI and 8,462 in VXUS, against full books of 1 and 9,293.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SLVI and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLVI or VXUS?
SLVI has an expense ratio of 0.78% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $73 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SLVI or VXUS?
Over the past year SLVI returned -17.74% vs +13.05% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SLVI annualized +39.18% vs +4.43% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLVI or VXUS?
SLVI yields 1.28% while VXUS yields 2.38%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than SLVI?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SLVI led over the full window, VXUS over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.