SLYV vs VOO
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. SLYV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLYV | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $4.9B | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.81% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 463 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +21.96% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +34.64% | +21.63% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.31% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.92% | +13.26% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 44.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.1% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2000 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SLYV vs VOO Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLYV returned +34.64% while VOO returned +21.63%. Year to date, SLYV is up 21.96% versus a gain of 13.72% for VOO.
Over three years, SLYV compounded at +14.31% per year against +21.55% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +7.92% and +13.26% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, SLYV has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs +13.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLYV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.1% for SLYV and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLYV charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLYV currently yields 1.81% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SLYV and VOO share 1 holdings out of 966 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SLYV | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| CAG | 0.71% | 0.00% | 0.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLYV or VOO?
SLYV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLYV or VOO?
Over the past year SLYV returned +34.64% vs +21.63% for VOO, so SLYV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SLYV annualized +13.59% vs +13.56% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLYV or VOO?
SLYV has been the more volatile fund at 44.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SLYV -63.1% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SLYV and VOO?
SLYV and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SLYV and VOO?
SLYV and VOO share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 966 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLYV or VOO?
SLYV yields 1.81% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SLYV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.