SLYV vs VTI
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SLYV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SLYV | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $5.1B | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.82% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 463 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +20.58% | +12.65% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.40% | +21.39% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +15.27% | +21.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.38% | +12.11% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 44.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -63.1% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | State Street Investment Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 25, 2000 | May 24, 2001 |
SLYV vs VTI Performance
State Street SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Value ETF (SLYV) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SLYV returned +32.40% while VTI returned +21.39%. Year to date, SLYV is up 20.58% versus a gain of 12.65% for VTI.
Over three years, SLYV compounded at +15.27% per year against +21.54% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +8.38% and +12.11% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, SLYV has the edge at +13.53% annualized vs +8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SLYV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 44.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -63.1% for SLYV and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SLYV charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SLYV currently yields 1.82% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SLYV and VTI share 357 holdings out of 2892 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SLYV or VTI?
SLYV has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $12 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SLYV or VTI?
Over the past year SLYV returned +32.40% vs +21.39% for VTI, so SLYV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), SLYV annualized +13.53% vs +8.07% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SLYV or VTI?
SLYV has been the more volatile fund at 44.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SLYV -63.1% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SLYV and VTI?
SLYV and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SLYV and VTI?
SLYV and VTI share 357 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2892 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SLYV or VTI?
SLYV yields 1.82% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SLYV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.