SMCC vs VTI
Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SMCC or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SMCC led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMCC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $530,152.15 | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 3 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +431.10%Best | +11.06% |
| 1Y Return | +127.28%Best | +15.41% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.48% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.52% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 12.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.9% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $25,351Best | $12,022 |
| Fund Family | Corgi Strategies, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2025 to Sep 16, 2026 (1.1 years).
SMCC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SMCC vs VTI Performance
Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF (SMCC) is an ETF from Corgi Strategies, LLC and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SMCC returned +127.28% while VTI returned +15.41%. Year to date, SMCC is up 431.10% versus a gain of 11.06% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.9% for SMCC and -8.9% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMCC charges 0.45% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $3 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMCC currently yields 0.00% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in SMCC and 3,463 in VTI, totalling 4.8% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in SMCC and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 3 and 3,543.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SMCC and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMCC or VTI?
SMCC has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SMCC or VTI?
Over the past year SMCC returned +127.28% vs +15.41% for VTI, so SMCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SMCC annualized +132.95% vs +18.22% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMCC or VTI?
SMCC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SMCC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. SMCC led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.