QQQ vs SMCC
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SMCC?
Large Cap Growth against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SMCC led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SMCC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $483.5B | $530,152.15 |
| Dividend Yield | 0.44% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 107 | 3 |
| YTD Return | +17.21% | +534.14%Best |
| 1Y Return | +22.10% | +171.80%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.27% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.60% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.3% | - |
| Max Drawdown | -12.0%Best | -75.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $12,799 | $30,317Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Corgi Strategies, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 30, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.1 years).
QQQ vs SMCC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SMCC Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF (SMCC) is an ETF from Corgi Strategies, LLC. Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% while SMCC returned +171.80%. Year to date, QQQ is up 17.21% versus a gain of 534.14% for SMCC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -12.0% for QQQ and -75.9% for SMCC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SMCC charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $45 annually, a gap of $27 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.44% against 0.00% for SMCC.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 102 holdings in QQQ and 1 in SMCC, totalling 99.9% and 4.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 102 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 1 in SMCC, against full books of 107 and 3.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SMCC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SMCC?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SMCC charges 0.45%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQQ or SMCC?
Over the past year QQQ returned +22.10% vs +171.80% for SMCC, so SMCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQQ annualized +25.15% vs +174.09% for SMCC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SMCC?
QQQ yields 0.44% while SMCC yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMCC better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. SMCC led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.