IVV vs SMCC
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF vs Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF
Which is better, IVV or SMCC?
Large Cap Blend against Trading-Leveraged Equity.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SMCC led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IVV | SMCC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.45% |
| AUM | $876.4B | $530,152.15 |
| Dividend Yield | 1.06% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 508 | 3 |
| YTD Return | +14.15% | +557.33%Best |
| 1Y Return | +17.31% | +160.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +23.17% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.85% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.8% | - |
| Max Drawdown | -8.9%Best | -75.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $12,326 | $31,089Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Corgi Strategies, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Alternative |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Trading-Leveraged Equity |
| Inception | May 15, 2000 | Jun 30, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2025 to Sep 21, 2026 (1.1 years).
IVV vs SMCC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
IVV vs SMCC Performance
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF (SMCC) is an ETF from Corgi Strategies, LLC. Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% while SMCC returned +160.42%. Year to date, IVV is up 14.15% versus a gain of 557.33% for SMCC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.9% for IVV and -75.9% for SMCC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IVV charges 0.03% per year while SMCC charges 0.45%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $45 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IVV currently yields 1.06% against 0.00% for SMCC.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 490 holdings in IVV and 1 in SMCC, totalling 99.3% and 4.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 490 positions we hold weights for in IVV and 1 in SMCC, against full books of 508 and 3.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of IVV and SMCC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IVV or SMCC?
IVV has an expense ratio of 0.03% while SMCC charges 0.45%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, IVV or SMCC?
Over the past year IVV returned +17.31% vs +160.42% for SMCC, so SMCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), IVV annualized +20.94% vs +180.43% for SMCC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, IVV or SMCC?
IVV yields 1.06% while SMCC yields 0.00%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMCC better than IVV?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. SMCC led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.