SMCC vs VXUS
Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Which is better, SMCC or VXUS?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SMCC led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMCC | VXUS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.45% | 0.05%Best |
| AUM | $530,152.15 | $158.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.51% |
| Holdings | 3 | 8,747 |
| YTD Return | +557.33%Best | +14.49% |
| 1Y Return | +160.42%Best | +21.52% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.55% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.57% |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 13.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.9% | -11.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.1 years | $31,089Best | $12,584 |
| Fund Family | Corgi Strategies, LLC | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 30, 2026 | Jan 26, 2011 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2025 to Sep 21, 2026 (1.1 years).
SMCC vs VXUS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SMCC vs VXUS Performance
Corgi SMCI 2x Daily ETF (SMCC) is an ETF from Corgi Strategies, LLC and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SMCC returned +160.42% while VXUS returned +21.52%. Year to date, SMCC is up 557.33% versus a gain of 14.49% for VXUS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -75.9% for SMCC and -11.3% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMCC charges 0.45% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $45 vs $5 annually, a gap of $40 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMCC currently yields 0.00% against 2.51% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in SMCC and 8,082 in VXUS, totalling 4.8% and 88.8% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in SMCC and 8,082 in VXUS, against full books of 3 and 8,747.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SMCC and VXUS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMCC or VXUS?
SMCC has an expense ratio of 0.45% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option, by $40 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SMCC or VXUS?
Over the past year SMCC returned +160.42% vs +21.52% for VXUS, so SMCC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SMCC annualized +180.43% vs +23.24% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMCC or VXUS?
SMCC yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.51%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VXUS better than SMCC?
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. SMCC led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.