SOCL vs VTI
Global X Social Media ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SOCL or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SOCL | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $85M | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.48% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 50 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -23.63% | +13.35%Best |
| 1Y Return | -28.29% | +15.92%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +7.19% | +23.41%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.69% | +12.83%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.3% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -68.7% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $7,461 | $18,286Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 69.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | Global X by mirae Asset | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 14, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 15, 2011 to Oct 2, 2026 (14.9 years).
SOCL vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 14.9 years both funds cover.
SOCL vs VTI Performance
Global X Social Media ETF (SOCL) is an ETF from Global X by mirae Asset and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SOCL returned -28.29% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, SOCL is down 23.63% versus a gain of 13.35% for VTI.
Over three years, SOCL compounded at +7.19% per year against +23.41% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -5.69% and +12.83% respectively. Across the full 15-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.20% annualized vs +7.57%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SOCL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.3% compared with 14.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -68.7% for SOCL and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SOCL charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SOCL currently yields 0.48% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
41.7% of SOCL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.7% of VTI's money is in holdings SOCL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 46 days apart, SOCL as of Sep 15, 2026 and VTI as of Jul 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
17 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in SOCL and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 50 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,143 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SOCL (92.8% of the fund), and 2 for SOCL that do not appear in VTI (5.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in SOCL | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 10.43% | 1.70% | 8.73% |
| RDDTReddit Inc-Cl A | 9.78% | 0.03% | 9.75% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 5.21% | 2.90% | 2.31% |
| PINSPinterest Inc. Class A | 4.85% | 0.01% | 4.84% |
| MTCHMatch Group Inc | 4.50% | 0.01% | 4.49% |
| SNAPSnap Inc. | 2.85% | 0.01% | 2.84% |
| IACIAC/InterActive Corp | 1.09% | 0.00% | 1.09% |
| DWACDigital World Acquisition-A | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.63% |
| YELPYelp, Inc. | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.56% |
| RUMRumble Inc. | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.36% |
41.7% of SOCL is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SOCL or VTI?
SOCL has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, SOCL or VTI?
Over the past year SOCL returned -28.29% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (15 years), SOCL annualized +7.57% vs +13.20% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, SOCL or VTI?
SOCL has been the more volatile fund at 23.3% annualized versus 14.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SOCL -68.7% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both SOCL and VTI?
SOCL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between SOCL and VTI?
41.7% of SOCL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.7% of VTI's is in holdings SOCL also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 47 positions we hold weights for in SOCL and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, SOCL or VTI?
SOCL yields 0.48% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SOCL?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.