SRTY vs VTI
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRTY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $80M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.93% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -47.25% | +13.87% | |
| 1Y Return | -65.14% | +23.31% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -45.73% | +21.17% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -33.19% | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.6% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2010 | May 24, 2001 |
SRTY vs VTI Performance
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRTY returned -65.14% while VTI returned +23.31%. Year to date, SRTY is down 47.25% versus a gain of 13.87% for VTI.
Over three years, SRTY compounded at -45.73% per year against +21.17% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -33.19% and +12.23% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.13% annualized vs -45.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.6% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for SRTY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.88. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRTY charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRTY currently yields 8.93% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SRTY and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRTY or VTI?
SRTY has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRTY or VTI?
Over the past year SRTY returned -65.14% vs +23.31% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), SRTY annualized -45.81% vs +8.13% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRTY or VTI?
SRTY has been the more volatile fund at 53.6% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SRTY -100.0% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SRTY and VTI?
SRTY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of -0.88, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRTY and VTI?
SRTY and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRTY or VTI?
SRTY yields 8.93% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SRTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.