SRTY vs VOO
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRTY | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $80M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.93% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -47.49% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -65.46% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -44.99% | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -33.56% | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2010 | Sep 7, 2010 |
SRTY vs VOO Performance
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRTY returned -65.46% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, SRTY is down 47.49% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Over three years, SRTY compounded at -44.99% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -33.56% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs -45.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for SRTY and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.84. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRTY charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRTY currently yields 8.93% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
SRTY and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRTY or VOO?
SRTY has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRTY or VOO?
Over the past year SRTY returned -65.46% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SRTY annualized -45.85% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRTY or VOO?
SRTY has been the more volatile fund at 53.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: SRTY -100.0% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both SRTY and VOO?
SRTY and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRTY and VOO?
SRTY and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRTY or VOO?
SRTY yields 8.93% while VOO yields 1.09%, so SRTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.