SRTY vs VYM
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SRTY | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $80M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.93% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 14 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | -47.49% | +15.80% | |
| 1Y Return | -65.46% | +26.12% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -44.99% | +18.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -33.56% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 53.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 9, 2010 | Nov 10, 2006 |
SRTY vs VYM Performance
ProShares UltraPro Short Russell2000 (SRTY) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SRTY returned -65.46% while VYM returned +26.12%. Year to date, SRTY is down 47.49% versus a gain of 15.80% for VYM.
Over three years, SRTY compounded at -44.99% per year against +18.25% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -33.56% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.07% annualized vs -45.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SRTY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for SRTY and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.81. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SRTY charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SRTY currently yields 8.93% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
SRTY and VYM share 0 holdings out of 559 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SRTY or VYM?
SRTY has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SRTY or VYM?
Over the past year SRTY returned -65.46% vs +26.12% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), SRTY annualized -45.85% vs +7.07% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SRTY or VYM?
SRTY has been the more volatile fund at 53.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: SRTY -100.0% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both SRTY and VYM?
SRTY and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SRTY and VYM?
SRTY and VYM share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SRTY or VYM?
SRTY yields 8.93% while VYM yields 2.86%, so SRTY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.