SSK vs VTI
REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SSK | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.40% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $72M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 33.27% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -39.11% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -56.55% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 51.2% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -77.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | REX Shares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jul 2, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
SSK vs VTI Performance
REX-Osprey SOL + Staking ETF (SSK) is a ETF from REX Shares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SSK returned -56.55% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, SSK is down 39.11% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SSK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 51.2% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.3% for SSK and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.25. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SSK charges 1.40% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $140 vs $3 annually, a gap of $137 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SSK currently yields 33.27% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
SSK and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SSK or VTI?
SSK has an expense ratio of 1.40% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $137 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SSK or VTI?
Over the past year SSK returned -56.55% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), SSK annualized -47.20% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SSK or VTI?
SSK has been the more volatile fund at 51.2% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SSK -77.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both SSK and VTI?
SSK and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.25, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between SSK and VTI?
SSK and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, SSK or VTI?
SSK yields 33.27% while VTI yields 1.07%, so SSK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.