SUPL vs VTI

SUPL vs VTI

Which is better, SUPL or VTI?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. SUPL led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.1%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSUPLVTI
Expense Ratio0.58%0.03%Best
AUM$2M$666.9B
Dividend Yield2.51%1.03%
Holdings403,543
YTD Return+11.32%+12.43%Best
1Y Return+20.72%Best+15.92%
3Y Return (annualized)+8.25%+22.42%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)20.1%15.4%Best
Max Drawdown-24.4%-19.8%Best
$10,000 over 4.5 years$12,407$17,764Best
Top 10 Weight46.1%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 6, 2022May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 7, 2022 to Sep 28, 2026 (4.5 years).

SUPL vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.5 years both funds cover.

SUPL vs VTI Performance

ProShares Supply Chain Logistics ETF (SUPL) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SUPL returned +20.72% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, SUPL is up 11.32% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.

Over three years, SUPL compounded at +8.25% per year against +22.42% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SUPL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.1% compared with 15.4% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.4% for SUPL and -19.8% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SUPL charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SUPL currently yields 2.51% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

SUPL already in VTI50.4%
VTI already in SUPL0.9%

50.4% of SUPL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.9% of VTI's money is in holdings SUPL also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

18 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in SUPL and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 40 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,133 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for SUPL (96.5% of the fund), and 1 for SUPL that do not appear in VTI (1.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in SUPLWeight in VTIDifference
UNPUnion Pacific Corp4.95%0.24%4.71%
NSCNorfolk Southern Corp4.89%0.10%4.79%
CSXCsx Corp.4.82%0.13%4.69%
FDXFedex Corp4.44%0.09%4.35%
UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc4.30%0.11%4.19%
EXPDExpeditors International Of Washington Inc3.98%0.03%3.95%
ODFLOld Dominion Freig3.68%0.06%3.62%
XPOXpo Logistics Inc.3.56%0.03%3.53%
JBHTJb Hunt Transport Services Inc.3.16%0.03%3.13%
CHRWCH Robinson Worldwide2.83%0.02%2.81%

50.4% of SUPL is already inside VTI.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

SUPLVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SUPL or VTI?

SUPL has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SUPL or VTI?

Over the past year SUPL returned +20.72% vs +15.92% for VTI, so SUPL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SUPL or VTI?

SUPL has been the more volatile fund at 20.1% annualized versus 15.4% for VTI. Worst drawdown: SUPL -24.4% vs VTI -19.8%.

Should I hold both SUPL and VTI?

SUPL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between SUPL and VTI?

50.4% of SUPL's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.9% of VTI's is in holdings SUPL also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 40 positions we hold weights for in SUPL and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, SUPL or VTI?

SUPL yields 2.51% while VTI yields 1.03%, so SUPL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than SUPL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. SUPL led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.