SZK vs VYM

SZK vs VYM

Which is better, SZK or VYM?

Opposite sides of the same exposure.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.79, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricSZKVYM
Expense Ratio0.95%0.04%Best
AUM$5M$81.6B
Dividend Yield2.77%2.22%
Holdings4613
YTD Return-13.59%+13.91%Best
1Y Return-7.32%+17.57%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-8.19%+18.12%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-3.18%+12.17%Best
Volatility (annualized)27.4%14.6%Best
Max Drawdown--58.8%
$10,000 over 5 years$8,508$17,758Best
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Inverse EquityLarge Cap Value
InceptionJan 30, 2007Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 1, 2007 to Sep 11, 2026 (19.6 years).

SZK vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.6 years both funds cover.

SZK vs VYM Performance

ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples (SZK) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SZK returned -7.32% while VYM returned +17.57%. Year to date, SZK is down 13.59% versus a gain of 13.91% for VYM.

Over three years, SZK compounded at -8.19% per year against +18.12% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are -3.18% and +12.17% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +6.83% annualized vs -20.42%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

SZK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.79. They move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, while paying both funds' fees.

Fees and Cost Over Time

SZK charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SZK currently yields 2.77% against 2.22% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of SZK and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

SZKVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, SZK or VYM?

SZK has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, SZK or VYM?

Over the past year SZK returned -7.32% vs +17.57% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), SZK annualized -20.42% vs +6.83% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, SZK or VYM?

SZK has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM.

Should I hold both SZK and VYM?

SZK and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of -0.79, so they move opposite each other. Holding both offsets the exposure rather than spreading it, and pays both funds' fees on the way. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, SZK or VYM?

SZK yields 2.77% while VYM yields 2.22%, so SZK currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than SZK?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. The two move opposite each other, correlation -0.79, so holding both offsets the exposure while paying both fees. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.