SZK vs VXUS
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SZK | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $4M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 2.66% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -16.61% | +14.19% | |
| 1Y Return | -6.03% | +27.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -6.82% | +19.53% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -3.64% | +9.03% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -99.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ProShares | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 30, 2007 | Jan 26, 2011 |
SZK vs VXUS Performance
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples (SZK) is a ETF from ProShares and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year SZK returned -6.03% while VXUS returned +27.38%. Year to date, SZK is down 16.61% versus a gain of 14.19% for VXUS.
Over three years, SZK compounded at -6.82% per year against +19.53% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -3.64% and +9.03% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.83% annualized vs -20.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SZK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.5% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -99.5% for SZK and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SZK charges 0.95% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $5 annually, a gap of $90 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SZK currently yields 2.66% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SZK or VXUS?
SZK has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $90 per year of difference.
Which performed better, SZK or VXUS?
Over the past year SZK returned -6.03% vs +27.38% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), SZK annualized -20.64% vs +4.83% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, SZK or VXUS?
SZK has been the more volatile fund at 27.5% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: SZK -99.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both SZK and VXUS?
SZK and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of -0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
Which pays a higher dividend, SZK or VXUS?
SZK yields 2.66% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so SZK currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.