TGRW vs VXUS
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TGRW | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $973M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +5.13% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +11.23% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.80% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.63% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 4, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
TGRW vs VXUS Performance
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TGRW returned +11.23% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, TGRW is up 5.13% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, TGRW compounded at +19.80% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +7.63% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, TGRW has the edge at +11.47% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.3% for TGRW and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TGRW charges 0.52% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $5 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TGRW currently yields 0.00% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
TGRW and VXUS share 5 holdings out of 7911 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TGRW or VXUS?
TGRW has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TGRW or VXUS?
Over the past year TGRW returned +11.23% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), TGRW annualized +11.47% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TGRW or VXUS?
TGRW has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: TGRW -43.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both TGRW and VXUS?
TGRW and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TGRW and VXUS?
TGRW and VXUS share 5 common holdings with a 1.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7911 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TGRW or VXUS?
TGRW yields 0.00% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.