TGRW vs VYM
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TGRW | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.52% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $973M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 56 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +4.78% | +16.53% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.86% | +25.03% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.86% | +18.54% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.67% | +12.25% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.2% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | T.Rowe Price | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Aug 4, 2020 | Nov 10, 2006 |
TGRW vs VYM Performance
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) is a ETF from T.Rowe Price and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TGRW returned +8.86% while VYM returned +25.03%. Year to date, TGRW is up 4.78% versus a gain of 16.53% for VYM.
Over three years, TGRW compounded at +19.86% per year against +18.54% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +7.67% and +12.25% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, TGRW has the edge at +11.38% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TGRW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.2% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.3% for TGRW and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.59. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TGRW charges 0.52% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $52 vs $4 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TGRW currently yields 0.00% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
TGRW and VYM share 4 holdings out of 609 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TGRW or VYM?
TGRW has an expense ratio of 0.52% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TGRW or VYM?
Over the past year TGRW returned +8.86% vs +25.03% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), TGRW annualized +11.38% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TGRW or VYM?
TGRW has been the more volatile fund at 20.2% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: TGRW -43.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both TGRW and VYM?
TGRW and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.59, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TGRW and VYM?
TGRW and VYM share 4 common holdings with a 6.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 609 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TGRW or VYM?
TGRW yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.