TJUN vs VTI
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TJUN | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -0.52% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.19% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.0% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
TJUN vs VTI Performance
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TJUN returned +8.19% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, TJUN is down 0.52% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 8.0% for TJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for TJUN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TJUN charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TJUN currently yields 0.00% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TJUN and VTI share 0 holdings out of 2784 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TJUN or VTI?
TJUN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TJUN or VTI?
Over the past year TJUN returned +8.19% vs +23.62% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TJUN annualized +10.67% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TJUN or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 8.0% for TJUN. Worst drawdown: TJUN -9.8% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TJUN and VTI?
TJUN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TJUN and VTI?
TJUN and VTI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2784 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TJUN or VTI?
TJUN yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.