TJUN vs VOO

TJUN vs VOO

Which is better, TJUN or VOO?

Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTJUNVOO
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$10M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings10509
YTD Return+1.48%+12.25%Best
1Y Return+5.27%+17.03%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.25%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.08%
Volatility (annualized)8.3%Best12.0%
Max Drawdown-9.8%-8.9%Best
$10,000 over 1.2 years$11,397$12,767Best
Fund FamilyFirst Trust Portfolios (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleOption WritingLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJun 20, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 23, 2025 to Sep 17, 2026 (1.2 years).

TJUN vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.2 years both funds cover.

TJUN vs VOO Performance

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TJUN returned +5.27% while VOO returned +17.03%. Year to date, TJUN is up 1.48% versus a gain of 12.25% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 8.3% for TJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for TJUN and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.66. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TJUN charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TJUN currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of TJUN and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

TJUNVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TJUN or VOO?

TJUN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, TJUN or VOO?

Over the past year TJUN returned +5.27% vs +17.03% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TJUN annualized +11.51% vs +22.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, TJUN or VOO?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 8.3% for TJUN. Worst drawdown: TJUN -9.8% vs VOO -8.9%.

Should I hold both TJUN and VOO?

TJUN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.66, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, TJUN or VOO?

TJUN yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than TJUN?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.