TJUN vs VOO
TJUN vs VOO
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TJUN | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $7M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | -0.12% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +8.59% | +23.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.50% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.44% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 8.1% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -9.8% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 20, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
TJUN vs VOO Performance
FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TJUN returned +8.59% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, TJUN is down 0.12% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.1% for TJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -9.8% for TJUN and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TJUN charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TJUN currently yields 0.00% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
TJUN and VOO share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TJUN or VOO?
TJUN has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TJUN or VOO?
Over the past year TJUN returned +8.59% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), TJUN annualized +11.16% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TJUN or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.1% for TJUN. Worst drawdown: TJUN -9.8% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both TJUN and VOO?
TJUN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TJUN and VOO?
TJUN and VOO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TJUN or VOO?
TJUN yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.