TMFC vs VXUS
TMFC vs VXUS
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TMFC | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.50% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $2.0B | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.11% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 103 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +12.43% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.39% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.46% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.62% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -33.1% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Motley Fool Asset Management | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 29, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
TMFC vs VXUS Performance
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMFC returned +21.39% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, TMFC is up 12.43% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, TMFC compounded at +25.46% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +14.62% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, TMFC has the edge at +18.21% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TMFC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for TMFC and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TMFC charges 0.50% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $5 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMFC currently yields 0.11% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
TMFC and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7962 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TMFC or VXUS?
TMFC has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $45 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TMFC or VXUS?
Over the past year TMFC returned +21.39% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), TMFC annualized +18.21% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TMFC or VXUS?
TMFC has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: TMFC -33.1% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both TMFC and VXUS?
TMFC and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TMFC and VXUS?
TMFC and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7962 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TMFC or VXUS?
TMFC yields 0.11% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.