TMFC vs VOO

Quick Verdict

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOMore Diversified: VOO

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTMFCVOOWinner
Expense Ratio0.50%0.03%
AUM$2.0B$979.0B
Dividend Yield0.11%1.09%
Holdings103509
YTD Return+12.43%+13.80%
1Y Return+21.39%+23.71%
3Y Return (annualized)+25.46%+21.50%
5Y Return (annualized)+14.62%+13.44%
Volatility (annualized)18.8%14.1%
Max Drawdown-33.1%-34.3%
Fund FamilyMotley Fool Asset ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
InceptionJan 29, 2018Sep 7, 2010

TMFC vs VOO Performance

Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) is a ETF from Motley Fool Asset Management and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TMFC returned +21.39% while VOO returned +23.71%. Year to date, TMFC is up 12.43% versus a gain of 13.80% for VOO.

Over three years, TMFC compounded at +25.46% per year against +21.50% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +14.62% and +13.44% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, TMFC has the edge at +18.21% annualized vs +13.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TMFC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.1% for TMFC and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TMFC charges 0.50% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $50 vs $3 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TMFC currently yields 0.11% against 1.09% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

29.6%overlap

TMFC and VOO share 42 holdings out of 564 unique holdings combined, representing a 29.6% weight overlap.

Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TMFCWeight in VOODifference
NVDA5.62%7.51%1.89%
AAPL5.18%6.59%1.41%
AMZN5.72%3.62%2.10%
GOOGProProPro
AVGOProProPro
METAProProPro
LLYProProPro
VProProPro
MAProProPro
LRCXProProPro
See all 10 holdings TMFC shares with VOO
Exact weights in each fund and the difference, for every overlapping position.
X-ray my whole portfolio$99/yr Pro · 7-day refund

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TMFC or VOO?

TMFC has an expense ratio of 0.50% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.

Which performed better, TMFC or VOO?

Over the past year TMFC returned +21.39% vs +23.71% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), TMFC annualized +18.21% vs +13.58% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Which is riskier, TMFC or VOO?

TMFC has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: TMFC -33.1% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both TMFC and VOO?

TMFC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.

What is the holdings overlap between TMFC and VOO?

TMFC and VOO share 42 common holdings with a 29.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 564 unique securities.

Which pays a higher dividend, TMFC or VOO?

TMFC yields 0.11% while VOO yields 1.09%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Get Full ETF Analytics

Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.

X-ray your whole portfolio
$99/yr7-day refund. ETFs, mutual funds, 401(k)s.
Get Pro →