TOKE vs VTI

TOKE vs VTI

Which is better, TOKE or VTI?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricTOKEVTI
Expense Ratio0.44%0.03%Best
AUM$14M$666.9B
Dividend Yield1.06%1.03%
Holdings243,543
Volatility (annualized)35.5%17.3%Best
Max Drawdown-83.3%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 6.7 years$2,670$24,514Best
Fund FamilyCambria Investment ManagementVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionJul 25, 2019May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.

The two price series end 147 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. TOKE has data through Apr 17, 2026 and VTI through Sep 11, 2026.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 6.7 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 25, 2019 to Apr 17, 2026 (6.7 years).

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

TOKE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 35.5% compared with 17.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -83.3% for TOKE and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

TOKE charges 0.44% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $44 vs $3 annually, a gap of $41 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TOKE currently yields 1.06% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 16 holdings in TOKE and 2,787 in VTI, totalling 69.9% and 90.6% of the two funds. Neither is a share of a fund we can divide by, so no overlap percentage is shown here. Within what we can see, 5 positions appear in both.

The two holdings books were reported 151 days apart, TOKE as of Jan 30, 2026 and VTI as of Jun 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.

5 positions in common, counted across the 16 positions we hold weights for in TOKE and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 24 and 3,543.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in TOKEWeight in VTIDifference
TPBTurning Point Brands, Inc.6.81%0.00%6.81%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.4.78%0.39%4.39%
MOAltria Group Inc.4.17%0.17%4.00%
JAZZJazz Pharmaceuticals Plc.3.27%0.02%3.25%
SAMBoston Beer Co., Inc. - Class A2.44%0.00%2.44%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of TOKE and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

TOKEVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, TOKE or VTI?

TOKE has an expense ratio of 0.44% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $41 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which is riskier, TOKE or VTI?

TOKE has been the more volatile fund at 35.5% annualized versus 17.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TOKE -83.3% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both TOKE and VTI?

TOKE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, TOKE or VTI?

TOKE yields 1.06% while VTI yields 1.03%, so TOKE currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than TOKE?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.