TSLW vs VTI
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TSLW | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $72M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 121.28% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 5 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -35.18% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | -7.91% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 59.9% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -54.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Roundhill Investments | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Feb 19, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
TSLW vs VTI Performance
Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay ETF (TSLW) is a ETF from Roundhill Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TSLW returned -7.91% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, TSLW is down 35.18% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
TSLW has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 59.9% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -54.3% for TSLW and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TSLW charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TSLW currently yields 121.28% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
TSLW and VTI share 1 holdings out of 2788 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TSLW | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TSLA | 19.90% | 1.63% | 18.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TSLW or VTI?
TSLW has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, TSLW or VTI?
Over the past year TSLW returned -7.91% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), TSLW annualized -4.39% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, TSLW or VTI?
TSLW has been the more volatile fund at 59.9% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: TSLW -54.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both TSLW and VTI?
TSLW and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between TSLW and VTI?
TSLW and VTI share 1 common holdings with a 1.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2788 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, TSLW or VTI?
TSLW yields 121.28% while VTI yields 1.07%, so TSLW currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.