UBR vs VOO

UBR vs VOO

Which is better, UBR or VOO?

Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. UBR led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUBRVOO
Expense Ratio0.95%0.03%Best
AUM$4M$997.4B
Dividend Yield1.63%1.04%
Holdings5509
YTD Return+34.13%Best+11.55%
1Y Return+61.59%Best+17.54%
3Y Return (annualized)+13.19%+20.71%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+5.79%+12.80%Best
Volatility (annualized)61.8%14.1%Best
Max Drawdown-97.2%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$13,250$18,262Best
Fund FamilyProSharesVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleTrading-Leveraged EquityLarge Cap Blend
InceptionApr 27, 2010Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 10, 2026 (16 years).

UBR vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.

UBR vs VOO Performance

ProShares Ultra MSCI Brazil Capped (UBR) is an ETF from ProShares and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UBR returned +61.59% while VOO returned +17.54%. Year to date, UBR is up 34.13% versus a gain of 11.55% for VOO.

Over three years, UBR compounded at +13.19% per year against +20.71% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +5.79% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.35% annualized vs -12.82%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UBR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 61.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -97.2% for UBR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.46. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UBR charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UBR currently yields 1.63% against 1.04% for VOO.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of UBR and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

UBRVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UBR or VOO?

UBR has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, UBR or VOO?

Over the past year UBR returned +61.59% vs +17.54% for VOO, so UBR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), UBR annualized -12.82% vs +13.35% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, UBR or VOO?

UBR has been the more volatile fund at 61.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: UBR -97.2% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both UBR and VOO?

UBR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.46, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, UBR or VOO?

UBR yields 1.63% while VOO yields 1.04%, so UBR currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than UBR?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. UBR led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.