USAF vs VTI

USAF vs VTI

Which is better, USAF or VTI?

VTI has been ahead.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.2%.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: VTILess Concentrated: VTI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUSAFVTI
Expense Ratio0.89%0.03%Best
AUM$17M$666.9B
Dividend Yield2.36%1.03%
Holdings733,543
YTD Return+3.08%+12.43%Best
1Y Return+3.94%+15.92%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.42%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.37%
Volatility (annualized)5.2%Best12.9%
Max Drawdown-4.5%Best-19.3%
$10,000 over 1.9 years$11,319$13,193Best
Top 10 Weight72.2%33.3%Best
Fund FamilyAtlas Capital TeamVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionNov 19, 2024May 24, 2001

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 20, 2024 to Sep 28, 2026 (1.9 years).

USAF vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.9 years both funds cover.

USAF vs VTI Performance

Atlas America Fund ETF (USAF) is an ETF from Atlas Capital Team and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year USAF returned +3.94% while VTI returned +15.92%. Year to date, USAF is up 3.08% versus a gain of 12.43% for VTI.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.9% compared with 5.2% for USAF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -4.5% for USAF and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

USAF charges 0.89% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $89 vs $3 annually, a gap of $86 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, USAF currently yields 2.36% against 1.03% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

USAF already in VTI13.4%
VTI already in USAF1.0%

13.4% of USAF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.0% of VTI's money is in holdings USAF also owns.

USAF and VTI share little of their money.

44 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in USAF and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 73 and 3,543.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 1,125 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for USAF (96.5% of the fund), and 18 for USAF that do not appear in VTI (83.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in USAFWeight in VTIDifference
WELLWelltower, Inc.1.35%0.23%1.12%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.1.37%0.09%1.28%
EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust1.32%0.14%1.18%
AMTAmerican Tower Corporation1.28%0.11%1.17%
ORealty Income Corp.1.26%0.08%1.18%
EQRVivmark Residential1.12%0.03%1.09%
CCICrown Castle International Corp0.69%0.05%0.64%
ESSEssex Property0.45%0.03%0.42%
SBACSba Communications Corp. Class A Real Estate Investment Tru0.40%0.03%0.37%
WPCW.P Carey Inc.0.36%0.02%0.34%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of USAF and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

USAFVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, USAF or VTI?

USAF has an expense ratio of 0.89% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $86 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, USAF or VTI?

Over the past year USAF returned +3.94% vs +15.92% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), USAF annualized +6.74% vs +15.70% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, USAF or VTI?

VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.9% annualized versus 5.2% for USAF. Worst drawdown: USAF -4.5% vs VTI -19.3%.

Should I hold both USAF and VTI?

USAF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between USAF and VTI?

13.4% of USAF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.0% of VTI's is in holdings USAF also owns. They hold 44 positions in common, counted across the 62 positions we hold weights for in USAF and 3,463 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, USAF or VTI?

USAF yields 2.36% while VTI yields 1.03%, so USAF currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than USAF?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 72.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.