UTEN vs VYM

UTEN vs VYM

Which is better, UTEN or VYM?

Long Term High Quality against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUTENVYM
Expense Ratio0.15%0.04%Best
AUM$268M$81.6B
Dividend Yield4.46%2.24%
Holdings2613
YTD Return-1.62%+15.29%Best
1Y Return+0.05%+22.23%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+2.80%+18.81%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.14%
Volatility (annualized)7.6%Best13.3%
Max Drawdown-13.4%Best-14.5%
$10,000 over 4.1 years$9,910$17,554Best
Fund FamilyUS Benchmark SeriesVanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleLong Term High QualityLarge Cap Value
InceptionAug 8, 2022Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 9, 2022 to Sep 3, 2026 (4.1 years).

UTEN vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.1 years both funds cover.

UTEN vs VYM Performance

F/m US Treasury 10 Year Note ETF (UTEN) is an ETF from US Benchmark Series and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UTEN returned +0.05% while VYM returned +22.23%. Year to date, UTEN is down 1.62% versus a gain of 15.29% for VYM.

Over three years, UTEN compounded at +2.80% per year against +18.81% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +14.71% annualized vs -0.22%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VYM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 7.6% for UTEN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.4% for UTEN and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.51. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UTEN charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UTEN currently yields 4.46% against 2.24% for VYM.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of UTEN and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

UTENVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UTEN or VYM?

UTEN has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, UTEN or VYM?

Over the past year UTEN returned +0.05% vs +22.23% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), UTEN annualized -0.22% vs +14.71% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, UTEN or VYM?

VYM has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 7.6% for UTEN. Worst drawdown: UTEN -13.4% vs VYM -14.5%.

Should I hold both UTEN and VYM?

UTEN and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.51, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, UTEN or VYM?

UTEN yields 4.46% while VYM yields 2.24%, so UTEN currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than UTEN?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.