VBCF vs VOO
Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, VBCF or VOO?
VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VBCF | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.08% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $43M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.28% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 376 | 509 |
| YTD Return | -0.24% | +12.37%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 2026 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
VBCF vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
VBCF vs VOO Performance
Vanguard Target Maturity 2032 Corporate Bond ETF (VBCF) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, VBCF is down 0.24% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VBCF charges 0.08% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $8 vs $3 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VBCF currently yields 1.28% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
At least 33.5% of VOO's money is in holdings VBCF also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VBCF, our book for it covers 28.7% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
75 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in VBCF and 494 in VOO, against full books of 376 and 509.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VBCF | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 0.35% | 7.05% | 6.70% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 0.69% | 4.13% | 3.44% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 0.54% | 2.86% | 2.32% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 0.98% | 1.90% | 0.92% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.03% | 1.46% | 0.43% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 1.39% | 0.63% | 0.76% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 0.24% | 1.44% | 1.20% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 1.07% | 0.34% | 0.73% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 0.12% | 1.21% | 1.09% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.97% | 0.30% | 0.67% |
33.5% of VOO is already inside VBCF.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VBCF or VOO?
VBCF has an expense ratio of 0.08% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between VBCF and VOO?
At least 33.5% of VOO's money is in holdings VBCF also owns. Our book for VBCF is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 75 positions in common, counted across the 94 positions we hold weights for in VBCF and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, VBCF or VOO?
VBCF yields 1.28% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VBCF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than VBCF?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.