VBK vs VTV
VBK vs VTV
Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF vs Vanguard Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VTV has a lower expense ratio. VTV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VBK offers more diversification with 542 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VBK | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $24.8B | $186.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.57% | 2.29% | |
| Holdings | 561 | 311 | |
| YTD Return | +17.71% | +17.56% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.45% | +29.46% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.91% | +18.21% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +5.29% | +12.55% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.6% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -59.4% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jan 26, 2004 | Jan 26, 2004 |
VBK vs VTV Performance
Vanguard Small Cap Growth ETF (VBK) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VBK returned +29.45% while VTV returned +29.46%. Year to date, VBK is up 17.71% versus a gain of 17.56% for VTV.
Over three years, VBK compounded at +16.91% per year against +18.21% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are +5.29% and +12.55% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VBK has the edge at +9.41% annualized vs +7.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VBK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.6% compared with 14.5% for VTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.4% for VBK and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VBK charges 0.05% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $3 annually, a gap of $2 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VBK currently yields 0.57% against 2.29% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VBK or VTV?
VBK has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VTV charges 0.03%. VTV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $2 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VBK or VTV?
Over the past year VBK returned +29.45% vs +29.46% for VTV, so VTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), VBK annualized +9.41% vs +7.59% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VBK or VTV?
VBK has been the more volatile fund at 19.6% annualized versus 14.5% for VTV. Worst drawdown: VBK -59.4% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both VBK and VTV?
VBK and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VBK and VTV?
VBK and VTV share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 848 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VBK or VTV?
VBK yields 0.57% while VTV yields 2.29%, so VTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.