VLUE vs VTV
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Which is better, VLUE or VTV?
VLUE has been ahead.
VTV has a lower expense ratio. VLUE led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTV is less concentrated, with 23.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VLUE | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9.6B | $187.8B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.39% | 1.82% |
| Holdings | 156 | 311 |
| YTD Return | +44.79%Best | +16.54% |
| 1Y Return | +69.51%Best | +23.50% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +31.86%Best | +18.57% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.37%Best | +12.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 13.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.5% | -36.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,273Best | $18,052 |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.0% | 23.6%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Apr 16, 2013 | Jan 26, 2004 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 18, 2013 to Sep 10, 2026 (13.4 years).
VLUE vs VTV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.4 years both funds cover.
VLUE vs VTV Performance
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF (VTV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VLUE returned +69.51% while VTV returned +23.50%. Year to date, VLUE is up 44.79% versus a gain of 16.54% for VTV.
Over three years, VLUE compounded at +31.86% per year against +18.57% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are +17.37% and +12.54% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VLUE has the edge at +12.20% annualized vs +10.73%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VLUE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 13.8% for VTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.5% for VLUE and -36.8% for VTV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.87. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VLUE charges 0.15% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VLUE currently yields 1.39% against 1.82% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
91.2% of VLUE's money is in holdings VTV also owns. 28.6% of VTV's money is in holdings VLUE also owns.
Most of VLUE is already inside VTV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
109 positions in common, counted across the 152 positions we hold weights for in VLUE and 308 in VTV, against full books of 156 and 311.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 192 positions for VTV that do not appear in our book for VLUE (68.8% of the fund), and 41 for VLUE that do not appear in VTV (8.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VLUE | Weight in VTV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 19.89% | 4.87% | 15.02% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.72% | 1.56% | 3.16% |
| GMGeneral Motors Co. | 3.83% | 0.26% | 3.57% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 2.17% | 1.36% | 0.81% |
| VZVerizon Communications, Inc. | 2.87% | 0.60% | 2.27% |
| TAt&t, Inc. | 2.47% | 0.54% | 1.93% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 1.62% | 0.85% | 0.77% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 1.51% | 0.73% | 0.78% |
| FFord Motor Co. | 2.00% | 0.20% | 1.80% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 1.24% | 0.95% | 0.29% |
91.2% of VLUE is already inside VTV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VLUE or VTV?
VLUE has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTV charges 0.03%. VTV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VLUE or VTV?
Over the past year VLUE returned +69.51% vs +23.50% for VTV, so VLUE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), VLUE annualized +12.20% vs +10.73% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VLUE or VTV?
VLUE has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 13.8% for VTV. Worst drawdown: VLUE -39.5% vs VTV -36.8%.
Should I hold both VLUE and VTV?
VLUE and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.87, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VLUE and VTV?
91.2% of VLUE's money is in holdings VTV also owns. 28.6% of VTV's is in holdings VLUE also owns. They hold 109 positions in common, counted across the 152 positions we hold weights for in VLUE and 308 in VTV.
Which pays a higher dividend, VLUE or VTV?
VLUE yields 1.39% while VTV yields 1.82%, so VTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTV better than VLUE?
VTV has a lower expense ratio. VLUE led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTV is less concentrated, with 23.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.