IWD vs VTV
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VTV has a lower expense ratio. IWD delivered stronger 1-year returns. IWD offers more diversification with 874 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | IWD | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $84.4B | $187.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.40% | 1.85% | |
| Holdings | 874 | 311 | |
| YTD Return | +21.91% | +17.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +30.17% | +25.71% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.36% | +18.72% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.64% | +12.32% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -61.9% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 22, 2000 | Jan 26, 2004 |
IWD vs VTV Performance
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF (VTV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year IWD returned +30.17% while VTV returned +25.71%. Year to date, IWD is up 21.91% versus a gain of 17.84% for VTV.
Over three years, IWD compounded at +19.36% per year against +18.72% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are +11.64% and +12.32% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, VTV has the edge at +7.57% annualized vs +6.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IWD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 14.5% for VTV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -61.9% for IWD and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.99. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
IWD charges 0.18% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $3 annually, a gap of $15 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, IWD currently yields 1.40% against 1.85% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
IWD and VTV share 284 holdings out of 892 unique holdings combined, representing a 62.1% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, IWD or VTV?
IWD has an expense ratio of 0.18% while VTV charges 0.03%. VTV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $15 per year of difference.
Which performed better, IWD or VTV?
Over the past year IWD returned +30.17% vs +25.71% for VTV, so IWD leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), IWD annualized +6.43% vs +7.57% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, IWD or VTV?
IWD has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 14.5% for VTV. Worst drawdown: IWD -61.9% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both IWD and VTV?
IWD and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.99, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between IWD and VTV?
IWD and VTV share 284 common holdings with a 62.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 892 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, IWD or VTV?
IWD yields 1.40% while VTV yields 1.85%, so VTV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.