VGIT vs VTV
Vanguard Intermediate Term Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF
Quick Verdict
VTV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTV offers more diversification with 311 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VGIT | VTV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $42.4B | $187.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.88% | 1.85% | |
| Holdings | 209 | 311 | |
| YTD Return | -0.22% | +18.15% | |
| 1Y Return | +1.22% | +25.72% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.11% | +19.20% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -0.07% | +12.30% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 4.3% | 14.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.2% | -61.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2009 | Jan 26, 2004 |
VGIT vs VTV Performance
Vanguard Intermediate Term Treasury ETF (VGIT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF (VTV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VGIT returned +1.22% while VTV returned +25.72%. Year to date, VGIT is down 0.22% versus a gain of 18.15% for VTV.
Over three years, VGIT compounded at +4.11% per year against +19.20% for VTV; over five years the annualized figures are -0.07% and +12.30% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, VTV has the edge at +7.59% annualized vs +0.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.5% compared with 4.3% for VGIT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.2% for VGIT and -61.3% for VTV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VGIT charges 0.03% per year while VTV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $3 annually. On income, VGIT currently yields 3.88% against 1.85% for VTV.
Holdings Overlap
VGIT and VTV share 0 holdings out of 392 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VGIT or VTV?
VGIT has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTV charges 0.03%. They cost the same. On a $10,000 investment, that is $0 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VGIT or VTV?
Over the past year VGIT returned +1.22% vs +25.72% for VTV, so VTV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VGIT annualized +0.78% vs +7.59% for VTV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VGIT or VTV?
VTV has been the more volatile fund at 14.5% annualized versus 4.3% for VGIT. Worst drawdown: VGIT -17.2% vs VTV -61.3%.
Should I hold both VGIT and VTV?
VGIT and VTV have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VGIT and VTV?
VGIT and VTV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 392 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VGIT or VTV?
VGIT yields 3.88% while VTV yields 1.85%, so VGIT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.