VGSH vs XLF

VGSH vs XLF

Which is better, VGSH or XLF?

Short Term Government Bond against Large Cap Value.

VGSH has a lower expense ratio. XLF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VGSHHigher Returns: XLF

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVGSHXLF
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.08%
AUM$34.7B$54.2B
Dividend Yield3.82%1.40%
Holdings9480
YTD Return+0.34%Best+0.15%
1Y Return+1.50%+2.69%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+4.06%+19.09%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+1.81%+9.27%Best
Volatility (annualized)1.4%Best19.2%
Max Drawdown-6.7%Best-43.3%
$10,000 over 5 years$10,938$15,578Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)SPDR State Street Global Advisors
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleShort Term Government BondLarge Cap Value
InceptionNov 19, 2009Dec 16, 1998

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 23, 2009 to Sep 23, 2026 (16.8 years).

VGSH vs XLF growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare VGSH against instead:VGSH vs SPYVGSH vs QQQVGSH vs VOOVGSH vs VTIXLF against:XLF vs VXUS

VGSH vs XLF Performance

Vanguard Short Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year VGSH returned +1.50% while XLF returned +2.69%. Year to date, VGSH is up 0.34% versus a gain of 0.15% for XLF.

Over three years, VGSH compounded at +4.06% per year against +19.09% for XLF; over five years the annualized figures are +1.81% and +9.27% respectively. Across the full 17-year window we track, XLF has the edge at +8.66% annualized vs +0.68%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

XLF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 1.4% for VGSH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -6.7% for VGSH and -43.3% for XLF. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.11. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VGSH charges 0.03% per year while XLF charges 0.08%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $8 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VGSH currently yields 3.82% against 1.40% for XLF.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 71 holdings in VGSH and 77 in XLF, totalling 76.6% and 100.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 71 positions we hold weights for in VGSH and 77 in XLF, against full books of 94 and 80.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VGSH and XLF you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VGSHXLF

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VGSH or XLF?

VGSH has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XLF charges 0.08%. VGSH is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VGSH or XLF?

Over the past year VGSH returned +1.50% vs +2.69% for XLF, so XLF leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (17 years), VGSH annualized +0.68% vs +8.66% for XLF. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VGSH or XLF?

XLF has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 1.4% for VGSH. Worst drawdown: VGSH -6.7% vs XLF -43.3%.

Should I hold both VGSH and XLF?

VGSH and XLF have a monthly-return correlation of -0.11, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, VGSH or XLF?

VGSH yields 3.82% while XLF yields 1.40%, so VGSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is XLF better than VGSH?

VGSH has a lower expense ratio. XLF led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.