VLUE vs VTI
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, VLUE or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VLUE led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VLUE | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $9.4B | $690.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.39% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 151 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +44.30%Best | +14.72% |
| 1Y Return | +59.02%Best | +16.82% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.30%Best | +22.93% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +17.32%Best | +12.78% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 14.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -39.5% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $22,226Best | $18,246 |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.7% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | iShares by BlackRock (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 16, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 18, 2013 to Oct 6, 2026 (13.5 years).
VLUE vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 13.5 years both funds cover.
VLUE vs VTI Performance
iShares MSCI USA Value Factor ETF (VLUE) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VLUE returned +59.02% while VTI returned +16.82%. Year to date, VLUE is up 44.30% versus a gain of 14.72% for VTI.
Over three years, VLUE compounded at +33.30% per year against +22.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +17.32% and +12.78% respectively. Across the full 14-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.06% annualized vs +12.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VLUE has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -39.5% for VLUE and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VLUE charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VLUE currently yields 1.39% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.6% of VLUE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 11.4% of VTI's money is in holdings VLUE also owns.
Most of VLUE is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
139 positions in common, counted across the 147 positions we hold weights for in VLUE and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 151 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,012 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for VLUE (86.0% of the fund), and 6 for VLUE that do not appear in VTI (2.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VLUE | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 21.35% | 1.29% | 20.06% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 4.27% | 0.57% | 3.70% |
| GMGeneral Motors Co | 3.65% | 0.11% | 3.54% |
| VZVerizon Communications Inc Vz | 3.05% | 0.24% | 2.81% |
| TAT&T Inc | 2.71% | 0.22% | 2.49% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 2.13% | 0.55% | 1.58% |
| DELLDell Technologies Inc | 1.89% | 0.16% | 1.73% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 1.93% | 0.09% | 1.84% |
| FFord Motor Co | 1.93% | 0.08% | 1.85% |
| CCitigroup Inc. | 1.61% | 0.30% | 1.31% |
97.6% of VLUE is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VLUE or VTI?
VLUE has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, VLUE or VTI?
Over the past year VLUE returned +59.02% vs +16.82% for VTI, so VLUE leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (14 years), VLUE annualized +12.11% vs +13.06% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, VLUE or VTI?
VLUE has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: VLUE -39.5% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both VLUE and VTI?
VLUE and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between VLUE and VTI?
97.6% of VLUE's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 11.4% of VTI's is in holdings VLUE also owns. They hold 139 positions in common, counted across the 147 positions we hold weights for in VLUE and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, VLUE or VTI?
VLUE yields 1.39% while VTI yields 1.03%, so VLUE currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than VLUE?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VLUE led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.