VOO vs WOOD
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | WOOD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.39% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $268M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 2.34% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 48 | |
| YTD Return | +12.68% | +0.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.87% | +0.06% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06% | +1.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | -1.79% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 22.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -63.8% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jun 24, 2008 |
VOO vs WOOD Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% while WOOD returned +0.06%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.68% versus a gain of 0.42% for WOOD.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +22.06% per year against +1.83% for WOOD; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and -1.79% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +2.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
WOOD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -63.8% for WOOD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while WOOD charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $39 annually, a gap of $36 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 2.34% for WOOD.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or WOOD?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WOOD charges 0.39%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $36 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or WOOD?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% vs +0.06% for WOOD, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VOO annualized +13.47% vs +2.79% for WOOD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or WOOD?
WOOD has been the more volatile fund at 22.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs WOOD -63.8%.
Should I hold both VOO and WOOD?
VOO and WOOD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and WOOD?
VOO and WOOD share 2 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or WOOD?
VOO yields 1.08% while WOOD yields 2.34%, so WOOD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.