VOO vs XBJL
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XBJL | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.79% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $77M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 7 | |
| YTD Return | +12.68% | +6.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.87% | +11.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06% | +12.46% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | +9.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 8.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -11.8% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Innovator ETFs Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jun 30, 2021 |
VOO vs XBJL Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - July (XBJL) is a ETF from Innovator ETFs Trust. Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% while XBJL returned +11.34%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.68% versus a gain of 6.58% for XBJL.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +22.06% per year against +12.46% for XBJL; over five years the annualized figures are +12.95% and +9.27% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs +9.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 8.0% for XBJL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -11.8% for XBJL. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XBJL charges 0.79%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $79 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 0.00% for XBJL.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XBJL?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XBJL charges 0.79%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $76 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XBJL?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% vs +11.34% for XBJL, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VOO annualized +13.47% vs +9.34% for XBJL. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XBJL?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 8.0% for XBJL. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XBJL -11.8%.
Should I hold both VOO and XBJL?
VOO and XBJL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XBJL?
VOO yields 1.08% while XBJL yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.