VOO vs XCNY
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. XCNY delivered stronger 1-year returns. XCNY offers more diversification with 1195 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XCNY | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.19% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $9M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 2.26% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 1,234 | |
| YTD Return | +13.72% | +18.12% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.63% | +29.74% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.55% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.26% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 14.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -18.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Sep 4, 2024 |
VOO vs XCNY Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF (XCNY) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors. Over the past year VOO returned +21.63% while XCNY returned +29.74%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.72% versus a gain of 18.12% for XCNY.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XCNY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -18.9% for XCNY. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XCNY charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $19 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 2.26% for XCNY.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XCNY share 1 holdings out of 1699 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in VOO | Weight in XCNY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| PG | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XCNY?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XCNY charges 0.19%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XCNY?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.63% vs +29.74% for XCNY, so XCNY leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VOO annualized +13.56% vs +19.39% for XCNY. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XCNY?
XCNY has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XCNY -18.9%.
Should I hold both VOO and XCNY?
VOO and XCNY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XCNY?
VOO and XCNY share 1 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1699 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XCNY?
VOO yields 1.09% while XCNY yields 2.26%, so XCNY currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.