VOO vs XES
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. XES delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XES | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $382M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 1.17% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 36 | |
| YTD Return | +14.27% | +46.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.79% | +90.48% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.19% | +11.97% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.28% | +21.67% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 39.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -96.1% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jun 19, 2006 |
VOO vs XES Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street SPDR S&P Oil & Gas Equipment & Services ETF (XES) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year VOO returned +21.79% while XES returned +90.48%. Year to date, VOO is up 14.27% versus a gain of 46.91% for XES.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +22.19% per year against +11.97% for XES; over five years the annualized figures are +13.28% and +21.67% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.59% annualized vs -3.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XES has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 39.8% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -96.1% for XES. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.60. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XES charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 1.17% for XES.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XES share 3 holdings out of 537 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.2% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XES?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XES charges 0.35%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XES?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.79% vs +90.48% for XES, so XES leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VOO annualized +13.59% vs -3.71% for XES. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XES?
XES has been the more volatile fund at 39.8% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XES -96.1%.
Should I hold both VOO and XES?
VOO and XES have a monthly-return correlation of 0.60, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XES?
VOO and XES share 3 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 537 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XES?
VOO yields 1.08% while XES yields 1.17%, so XES currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.