VOO vs XIDV
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. XIDV delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XIDV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.19% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $47M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 5.77% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 90 | |
| YTD Return | +12.25% | +19.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.92% | +27.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.79% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 9.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -12.2% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jan 21, 2025 |
VOO vs XIDV Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Franklin International Dividend Booster Index ETF (XIDV) is a ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year VOO returned +20.92% while XIDV returned +27.62%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.25% versus a gain of 19.77% for XIDV.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 9.9% for XIDV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -12.2% for XIDV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.11. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XIDV charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $19 annually, a gap of $16 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 5.77% for XIDV.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XIDV share 0 holdings out of 592 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XIDV?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XIDV charges 0.19%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $16 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XIDV?
Over the past year VOO returned +20.92% vs +27.62% for XIDV, so XIDV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), VOO annualized +13.45% vs +40.09% for XIDV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XIDV?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 9.9% for XIDV. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XIDV -12.2%.
Should I hold both VOO and XIDV?
VOO and XIDV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.11, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XIDV?
VOO and XIDV share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 592 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XIDV?
VOO yields 1.08% while XIDV yields 5.77%, so XIDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.