VOO vs XJAN
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XJAN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.85% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $43M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 6 | |
| YTD Return | +12.25% | +5.77% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.92% | +9.80% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.79% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 4.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -10.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jan 22, 2024 |
VOO vs XJAN Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest US Equity Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF - January (XJAN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year VOO returned +20.92% while XJAN returned +9.80%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.25% versus a gain of 5.77% for XJAN.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 4.5% for XJAN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -10.0% for XJAN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XJAN charges 0.85%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $85 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 0.00% for XJAN.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XJAN share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XJAN?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XJAN charges 0.85%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $82 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XJAN?
Over the past year VOO returned +20.92% vs +9.80% for XJAN, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), VOO annualized +13.45% vs +9.39% for XJAN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XJAN?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 4.5% for XJAN. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XJAN -10.0%.
Should I hold both VOO and XJAN?
VOO and XJAN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XJAN?
VOO and XJAN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XJAN?
VOO yields 1.08% while XJAN yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.