VOO vs XLCI
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XLCI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.35% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $3M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 11.76% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 3 | |
| YTD Return | +12.76% | +1.58% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.14% | +5.77% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.69% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.00% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 10.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -8.4% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | State Street Investment Management | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jul 29, 2025 |
VOO vs XLCI Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) is a ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year VOO returned +20.14% while XLCI returned +5.77%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.76% versus a gain of 1.58% for XLCI.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 10.9% for XLCI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -8.4% for XLCI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XLCI charges 0.35%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $35 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 11.76% for XLCI.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XLCI share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XLCI?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XLCI charges 0.35%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XLCI?
Over the past year VOO returned +20.14% vs +5.77% for XLCI, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), VOO annualized +13.47% vs +7.50% for XLCI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XLCI?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 10.9% for XLCI. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XLCI -8.4%.
Should I hold both VOO and XLCI?
VOO and XLCI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XLCI?
VOO and XLCI share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XLCI?
VOO yields 1.08% while XLCI yields 11.76%, so XLCI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.