VOO vs XOMO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. XOMO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | XOMO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.25% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $39M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 37.71% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 13 | |
| YTD Return | +12.25% | +23.78% | |
| 1Y Return | +20.92% | +36.21% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.79% | +9.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.05% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 17.5% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -18.9% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | YieldMax ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Aug 30, 2023 |
VOO vs XOMO Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year VOO returned +20.92% while XOMO returned +36.21%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.25% versus a gain of 23.78% for XOMO.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.79% per year against +9.26% for XOMO. Across the full 3-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.45% annualized vs +9.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
XOMO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.5% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -18.9% for XOMO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.17. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while XOMO charges 1.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $125 annually, a gap of $122 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 37.71% for XOMO.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and XOMO share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or XOMO?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while XOMO charges 1.25%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $122 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or XOMO?
Over the past year VOO returned +20.92% vs +36.21% for XOMO, so XOMO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), VOO annualized +13.45% vs +9.26% for XOMO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or XOMO?
XOMO has been the more volatile fund at 17.5% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs XOMO -18.9%.
Should I hold both VOO and XOMO?
VOO and XOMO have a monthly-return correlation of -0.17, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and XOMO?
VOO and XOMO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or XOMO?
VOO yields 1.08% while XOMO yields 37.71%, so XOMO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.