VOO vs YANG
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | YANG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.03% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $99M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 3.49% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 7 | |
| YTD Return | +13.25% | +30.02% | |
| 1Y Return | +19.96% | +11.77% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.27% | -44.82% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.81% | -38.34% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 66.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -100.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Dec 3, 2009 |
VOO vs YANG Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Direxion Daily FTSE China Bear 3X ETF (YANG) is a ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust. Over the past year VOO returned +19.96% while YANG returned +11.77%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.25% versus a gain of 30.02% for YANG.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.27% per year against -44.82% for YANG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.81% and -38.34% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.49% annualized vs -38.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YANG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 66.3% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -100.0% for YANG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.38. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while YANG charges 1.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $103 annually, a gap of $100 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 3.49% for YANG.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and YANG share 0 holdings out of 508 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or YANG?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YANG charges 1.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $100 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or YANG?
Over the past year VOO returned +19.96% vs +11.77% for YANG, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VOO annualized +13.49% vs -38.07% for YANG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or YANG?
YANG has been the more volatile fund at 66.3% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs YANG -100.0%.
Should I hold both VOO and YANG?
VOO and YANG have a monthly-return correlation of -0.38, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and YANG?
VOO and YANG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 508 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or YANG?
VOO yields 1.08% while YANG yields 3.49%, so YANG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.