VOO vs YJUN
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | YJUN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.90% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $138M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 5 | |
| YTD Return | +13.80% | +7.07% | |
| 1Y Return | +23.71% | +12.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.50% | +10.38% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.44% | +6.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 11.0% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -21.5% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | First Trust Portfolios (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jun 18, 2021 |
VOO vs YJUN Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (YJUN) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year VOO returned +23.71% while YJUN returned +12.22%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.80% versus a gain of 7.07% for YJUN.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.50% per year against +10.38% for YJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.44% and +6.36% respectively. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.58% annualized vs +6.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.1% compared with 11.0% for YJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -21.5% for YJUN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while YJUN charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $90 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for YJUN.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and YJUN share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or YJUN?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YJUN charges 0.90%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $87 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or YJUN?
Over the past year VOO returned +23.71% vs +12.22% for YJUN, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), VOO annualized +13.58% vs +6.33% for YJUN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or YJUN?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 14.1% annualized versus 11.0% for YJUN. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs YJUN -21.5%.
Should I hold both VOO and YJUN?
VOO and YJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and YJUN?
VOO and YJUN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or YJUN?
VOO yields 1.09% while YJUN yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.