VOO vs YJUN

VOO vs YJUN

Which is better, VOO or YJUN?

Large Cap Blend against Option Writing.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOO

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVOOYJUN
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.90%
AUM$997.4B$145M
Dividend Yield1.04%0.00%
Holdings50910
YTD Return+12.25%Best+6.04%
1Y Return+17.03%Best+9.09%
3Y Return (annualized)+21.25%Best+10.54%
5Y Return (annualized)+13.08%Best+6.09%
Volatility (annualized)15.5%10.9%Best
Max Drawdown-24.5%-21.5%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$18,490Best$13,439
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)First Trust Portfolios (US)
CategoryEquityAlternative
StyleLarge Cap BlendOption Writing
InceptionSep 7, 2010Jun 18, 2021

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 21, 2021 to Sep 17, 2026 (5.2 years).

VOO vs YJUN growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.2 years both funds cover.

VOO vs YJUN Performance

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and FT Vest International Equity Moderate Buffer ETF - June (YJUN) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year VOO returned +17.03% while YJUN returned +9.09%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.25% versus a gain of 6.04% for YJUN.

Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.25% per year against +10.54% for YJUN; over five years the annualized figures are +13.08% and +6.09% respectively.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 10.9% for YJUN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -24.5% for VOO and -21.5% for YJUN. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VOO charges 0.03% per year while YJUN charges 0.90%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $90 annually, a gap of $87 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 0.00% for YJUN.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VOO and YJUN you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VOOYJUN

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VOO or YJUN?

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YJUN charges 0.90%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $87 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VOO or YJUN?

Over the past year VOO returned +17.03% vs +9.09% for YJUN, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VOO or YJUN?

VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 10.9% for YJUN. Worst drawdown: VOO -24.5% vs YJUN -21.5%.

Should I hold both VOO and YJUN?

VOO and YJUN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or YJUN?

VOO yields 1.04% while YJUN yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is YJUN better than VOO?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.