VOO vs YMAG
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | YMAG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.34% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $278M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 58.52% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 9 | |
| YTD Return | +13.44% | +4.45% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.62% | +14.34% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.47% | - | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.27% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 17.9% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -26.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | YieldMax ETF | |
| Category | Equity | Alternative | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jan 29, 2024 |
VOO vs YMAG Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and YieldMax Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETF (YMAG) is a ETF from YieldMax ETF. Over the past year VOO returned +22.62% while YMAG returned +14.34%. Year to date, VOO is up 13.44% versus a gain of 4.45% for YMAG.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YMAG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.9% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -26.0% for YMAG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while YMAG charges 1.34%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $134 annually, a gap of $131 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 58.52% for YMAG.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and YMAG share 0 holdings out of 513 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or YMAG?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YMAG charges 1.34%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $131 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or YMAG?
Over the past year VOO returned +22.62% vs +14.34% for YMAG, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), VOO annualized +13.55% vs +22.55% for YMAG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or YMAG?
YMAG has been the more volatile fund at 17.9% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs YMAG -26.0%.
Should I hold both VOO and YMAG?
VOO and YMAG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and YMAG?
VOO and YMAG share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 513 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or YMAG?
VOO yields 1.09% while YMAG yields 58.52%, so YMAG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.