VOO vs YOLO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs ADVISORSHARES PURE CANNABIS ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | YOLO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.51% | |
| AUM | $979.0B | $30M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.09% | 0.00% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 16 | |
| YTD Return | +14.48% | -14.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.02% | -11.66% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.80% | +4.32% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.36% | -29.70% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.2% | 53.4% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -94.7% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Advisor Shares | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Apr 17, 2019 |
VOO vs YOLO Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and ADVISORSHARES PURE CANNABIS ETF (YOLO) is a ETF from Advisor Shares. Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% while YOLO returned -11.66%. Year to date, VOO is up 14.48% versus a loss of 14.79% for YOLO.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.80% per year against +4.32% for YOLO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.36% and -29.70% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.61% annualized vs -23.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
YOLO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 53.4% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -94.7% for YOLO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while YOLO charges 0.51%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $51 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.09% against 0.00% for YOLO.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and YOLO share 0 holdings out of 524 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or YOLO?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while YOLO charges 0.51%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or YOLO?
Over the past year VOO returned +22.02% vs -11.66% for YOLO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), VOO annualized +13.61% vs -23.82% for YOLO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or YOLO?
YOLO has been the more volatile fund at 53.4% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs YOLO -94.7%.
Should I hold both VOO and YOLO?
VOO and YOLO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and YOLO?
VOO and YOLO share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 524 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or YOLO?
VOO yields 1.09% while YOLO yields 0.00%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.