VOO vs ZSB
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF vs USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ZSB delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VOO | ZSB | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 0.59% | |
| AUM | $997.4B | $2M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.08% | 0.90% | |
| Holdings | 509 | 15 | |
| YTD Return | +12.68% | +5.17% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.87% | +53.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.06% | +5.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.95% | - | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.1% | 21.8% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -49.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | USCF Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Commodity | |
| Inception | Sep 7, 2010 | Jan 10, 2023 |
VOO vs ZSB Performance
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and USCF Sustainable Battery Metals Strategy ETF (ZSB) is a ETF from USCF Investments. Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% while ZSB returned +53.19%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.68% versus a gain of 5.17% for ZSB.
Over three years, VOO compounded at +22.06% per year against +5.26% for ZSB. Across the full 4-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.47% annualized vs -1.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ZSB has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for VOO and -49.3% for ZSB. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.08. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VOO charges 0.03% per year while ZSB charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.08% against 0.90% for ZSB.
Holdings Overlap
VOO and ZSB share 0 holdings out of 506 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VOO or ZSB?
VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZSB charges 0.59%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VOO or ZSB?
Over the past year VOO returned +21.87% vs +53.19% for ZSB, so ZSB leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), VOO annualized +13.47% vs -1.32% for ZSB. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VOO or ZSB?
ZSB has been the more volatile fund at 21.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -34.3% vs ZSB -49.3%.
Should I hold both VOO and ZSB?
VOO and ZSB have a monthly-return correlation of 0.08, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VOO and ZSB?
VOO and ZSB share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 506 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or ZSB?
VOO yields 1.08% while ZSB yields 0.90%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.