VOO vs ZSC

VOO vs ZSC

Which is better, VOO or ZSC?

Each has led over a different period.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 3Y and the full window, ZSC over 1Y.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricVOOZSC
Expense Ratio0.03%Best0.59%
AUM$997.4B$3M
Dividend Yield1.04%1.55%
Holdings50931
YTD Return+12.50%Best+12.07%
1Y Return+17.58%+29.24%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+21.27%Best+5.47%
5Y Return (annualized)+12.95%-
Volatility (annualized)12.8%Best13.9%
Max Drawdown-18.7%Best-26.5%
$10,000 over 3.1 years$17,872Best$10,970
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)USCF Investments
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionSep 7, 2010Aug 9, 2023

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 9, 2023 to Sep 11, 2026 (3.1 years).

VOO vs ZSC growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.

VOO vs ZSC Performance

Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and USCF Sustainable Commodity Strategy Fund (ZSC) is an ETF from USCF Investments. Over the past year VOO returned +17.58% while ZSC returned +29.24%. Year to date, VOO is up 12.50% versus a gain of 12.07% for ZSC.

Over three years, VOO compounded at +21.27% per year against +5.47% for ZSC.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ZSC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.9% compared with 12.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -18.7% for VOO and -26.5% for ZSC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

VOO charges 0.03% per year while ZSC charges 0.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $59 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VOO currently yields 1.04% against 1.55% for ZSC.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of VOO and ZSC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

VOOZSC

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, VOO or ZSC?

VOO has an expense ratio of 0.03% while ZSC charges 0.59%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, VOO or ZSC?

Over the past year VOO returned +17.58% vs +29.24% for ZSC, so ZSC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, VOO or ZSC?

ZSC has been the more volatile fund at 13.9% annualized versus 12.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: VOO -18.7% vs ZSC -26.5%.

Should I hold both VOO and ZSC?

VOO and ZSC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, VOO or ZSC?

VOO yields 1.04% while ZSC yields 1.55%, so ZSC currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is ZSC better than VOO?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 3Y and the full window, ZSC over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.