VTI vs VTN
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | VTN | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 2.69% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $3,218.67 | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 7.78% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 183 | |
| YTD Return | +13.14% | -2.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.35% | +13.10% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.83% | +10.24% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.01% | +0.46% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 13.7% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -100.0% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Tax Preferred | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Mar 27, 1992 |
VTI vs VTN Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals (VTN) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% while VTN returned +13.10%. Year to date, VTI is up 13.14% versus a loss of 2.52% for VTN.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.83% per year against +10.24% for VTN; over five years the annualized figures are +12.01% and +0.46% respectively. Across the full 25-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +0.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.7% for VTN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -100.0% for VTN. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.24. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while VTN charges 2.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $269 annually, a gap of $266 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 7.78% for VTN.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and VTN share 0 holdings out of 2861 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or VTN?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while VTN charges 2.69%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $266 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or VTN?
Over the past year VTI returned +22.35% vs +13.10% for VTN, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (25 years), VTI annualized +8.09% vs +0.01% for VTN. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or VTN?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.7% for VTN. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs VTN -100.0%.
Should I hold both VTI and VTN?
VTI and VTN have a monthly-return correlation of 0.24, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and VTN?
VTI and VTN share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2861 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or VTN?
VTI yields 1.07% while VTN yields 7.78%, so VTN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.