VTN vs VXUS
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTN | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.79% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $3,218.67 | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 7.48% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 183 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +3.84% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.23% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +11.91% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +1.60% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Tax Preferred | Equity | |
| Inception | Mar 27, 1992 | Jan 26, 2011 |
VTN vs VXUS Performance
Invesco Trust for Investment Grade New York Municipals (VTN) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year VTN returned +17.23% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, VTN is up 3.84% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, VTN compounded at +11.91% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +1.60% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.86% annualized vs +0.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VXUS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.8% for VTN. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for VTN and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.44. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTN charges 1.79% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $179 vs $5 annually, a gap of $174 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTN currently yields 7.48% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
VTN and VXUS share 0 holdings out of 7935 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTN or VXUS?
VTN has an expense ratio of 1.79% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $174 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTN or VXUS?
Over the past year VTN returned +17.23% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), VTN annualized +0.22% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTN or VXUS?
VXUS has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.8% for VTN. Worst drawdown: VTN -100.0% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both VTN and VXUS?
VTN and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.44, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTN and VXUS?
VTN and VXUS share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7935 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTN or VXUS?
VTN yields 7.48% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so VTN currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.