VTI vs WBIG
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF vs WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. WBIG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | VTI | WBIG | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03% | 1.59% | |
| AUM | $666.9B | $33M | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.07% | 1.00% | |
| Holdings | 3,543 | 81 | |
| YTD Return | +12.65% | +14.91% | |
| 1Y Return | +21.39% | +21.52% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.54% | +7.70% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.11% | +2.13% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3% | 11.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -56.6% | -25.3% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | WBI Investments | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 24, 2001 | Aug 25, 2014 |
VTI vs WBIG Performance
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG) is a ETF from WBI Investments. Over the past year VTI returned +21.39% while WBIG returned +21.52%. Year to date, VTI is up 12.65% versus a gain of 14.91% for WBIG.
Over three years, VTI compounded at +21.54% per year against +7.70% for WBIG; over five years the annualized figures are +12.11% and +2.13% respectively. Across the full 12-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.07% annualized vs +1.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 11.3% for WBIG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -56.6% for VTI and -25.3% for WBIG. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
VTI charges 0.03% per year while WBIG charges 1.59%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $159 annually, a gap of $156 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, VTI currently yields 1.07% against 1.00% for WBIG.
Holdings Overlap
VTI and WBIG share 63 holdings out of 2804 unique holdings combined, representing a 5.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, VTI or WBIG?
VTI has an expense ratio of 0.03% while WBIG charges 1.59%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $156 per year of difference.
Which performed better, VTI or WBIG?
Over the past year VTI returned +21.39% vs +21.52% for WBIG, so WBIG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (12 years), VTI annualized +8.07% vs +1.45% for WBIG. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, VTI or WBIG?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 11.3% for WBIG. Worst drawdown: VTI -56.6% vs WBIG -25.3%.
Should I hold both VTI and WBIG?
VTI and WBIG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between VTI and WBIG?
VTI and WBIG share 63 common holdings with a 5.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2804 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, VTI or WBIG?
VTI yields 1.07% while WBIG yields 1.00%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.